Welcome to Sign in | Join | Help
Where's OSHA ??

We’ll – from where I stand it’s been since 1999 that the voluntary consensus standards began their migration march of updating approaches for machine safe guarding. That first standard was RIA 15.06 for industrial robots. One of many changes of this updated standard was the requirement to conduct a risk analysis on all robots within two years. The next major standard to update and provide new approaches to machine guarding was NFPA 79’s release in 2002. The major enhancements with this change include the opportunity to apply safety PLC’s, the ability to install e-stops on a safety certified bus, and the elimination of the mandate to hard wire all safety circuits. All of these changes are to some point driven by the desire for harmonization with European standards.

 

Since this beginning of the migration march for new opportunities in machine safe guarding, many more of our standards are falling in line and adopting these new concepts. Several that come to mind include:

1.      ANSI B11.TR3- 2000, Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction

2.      ANSI B11.TR4-2004, Selection of Programmable Electronic Systems (PES/PLC) for Machine Tools

3.      ANSI Z244.1-2003, Control of Hazardous Energy

4.      ANSI/PMMI B155.1-2006, Safety Requirements for Packaging Machinery

5.      NFPA 79-2007, Electrical Standard for Industrial Machinery

6.      SEMI S2, Safety Guidelines for Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment

 

Several more consensus standards are in committee as we speak and will be publishing approved updates within months further confirming that a major paradigm shift has been underway for nearly eight years in the US. Throughout this time OSHA has done nothing I’m aware of to openly acknowledge any of these changes.

 

So – is there anyone out there who can write a comment into this blog and give us any clue to what OSHA is doing to update their 29CFR 1910 series of regulations?  

Published Tuesday, June 12, 2007 3:28 PM by

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# Should the new B155.1 Risk Assessment Standard be applied to existing machinery?

Does the new Risk Assessment standard ANSI/PMMI B155.1-2006 for Packaging Machinery require you to modify existing designs or manufacturing processes in order to incorporate the new or revised requirements of this standard into their product development or production system?
Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:16 PM by Mike Morton

# Safety PLC vs Safety Relays

What is a good rule of thumb for when you should apply safety relays verses using a Safety PLC? I have a machine that has 8 Estops and 2 light curtains, one two hand control station which shut down three motors for a safe stop. There are three zones of safety. The Estop stations are in series and each are about every 15 feet apart. Inputs from the machine PLC monitor the Safety circuits. The safety system is Catagory 2& 3. Should I consider using a Safety PLC?
Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:37 PM by Mike Morton

# re: Where's OSHA ??

You are the best J.B.
Wednesday, August 08, 2007 10:38 AM by Bill Smith

# re: Where's OSHA ??

No, existing machinery does not automatically need to be upgraded. The risk analysis for that machine will drive the process for compliance barring any unfortunate accidents.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:32 PM by

# re: Where's OSHA ??

Thank you for the unconditional comment.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:36 PM by

# re: Where's OSHA ??

A simple machine may not qualify for safety automation. However, it's also easy to compare the cost of running conduit, wiring, and trouble shooting. Sometimes a simple machine is also large enough that hardwiring can be more expensive simple safety automation. Light curtains can easily involve eight wires each for example. Generally we see 5 or 6 safety relays can justify a safety PLC.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:52 PM by

# re: Where's OSHA ??

A simple machine may not qualify for safety automation. However, it's also easy to compare the cost of running conduit, wiring, and trouble shooting. Sometimes a simple machine is also large enough that hardwiring can be more expensive than simple safety automation. Light curtains can easily involve eight wires each for example. Generally we see 5 or 6 safety relays can justify a safety PLC.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:53 PM by

Leave a Comment

(required) 
required 
(required)