Welcome to Sign in | Join | Help
Categories of Risk – Alive or Dead?

Yes it’s true, Europe has started a two year phase out of the risk categories; B, 1, 2, 3, & 4 as established by EN 954:1996 and hence referenced in numerous US based standards such as NFPA 79, ANSI B11, S2, ANSI B155.1, etc. to name a few. A  European standard, EN ISO 13849-1:2006, has recently been approved announcing a new system called Performance Level (PLa, b, c, d, & e) for determining risk levels on a machine replacing the Category system by 2009. So far, it doesn’t seem that any US based standards groups are mustering the troops to update recently modified standards that acknowledged the EN 954 Category system of 1996. The ink has barely dried for gosh sakes! Categories are a product of the task based objective risk assessment process currently still being introduced across the nation for discrete industries.

 

The PL system, on the other hand, is a quantitative based approach that (if adopted in the US) will require industries across the land to learn or acquire new skills in order to be compliant. One new requirement is calculating MTTFd (mean time to fail dangerous) and another is PFHd (probability of dangerous failure per hour). These values will need to be determined for components such as interlock switches and sensors. Does anyone believe that industry is ready for this tidal wave?

 

Or, will Categories live on………….?

Published Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:06 PM by

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# re: Categories of Risk – Alive or Dead?

Does the U.S. have the option to never adopt the new version of the ISO standard? Can we only adopt the parts we like? If we ever do adopt the new version of the ISO standard, will it be only as part of some other existing standard, or as a new standard?
Friday, September 14, 2007 10:37 AM by John Jenkins

# re: Categories of Risk – Alive or Dead?

1.) Yes, the US has the option (FYI - the US voted against approval of ISO 13849-1:2006), however, it's likely the various consensus standards will likely adopt portions of the European standard.

2.) Yes, the US can adopt portions of ISO 13849-1 as determined applicapable to US industry.

3.) Yes, what ever is ultimately adopted will surface in normal update cycles of US consensus standards. For example, I have submitted this issue to the NFPA 79 committee for consideration in the 2011 update.

Friday, September 14, 2007 11:23 AM by

Leave a Comment

(required) 
required 
(required)