Welcome to
Sign in
|
Join
|
Help
Siemens Process Safety USA
Syndication
RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Search
Go
Tags
1oo2
1oo2D
2oo2
2oo3
4-20ma
AEsoluntions
air products
alarm management
Analog input
Anchorage
ANSI/ISA S18.2
ANSI/ISA-84.00.01
Arctic ISA
bill goble
BMS
BPCS
conoco Phillips
Control magazine
customer service
cyber security
dave deibert
delta v sis
DMR
emerson
exida
exiderdome
external watchdog timer
flow transmitter
FUD
galveston
Hart
ICS Triplex
IEC 61508
IEC 61511
Imperial Sugar company
ISA
ISA Expo 2007
isa Expo 2009
ISA S84
Jack Murray
Kenexis
Kevin Klein
layer of protection
listed
LOPA
manual proof test
master fuel trip
MFT
Mike Scott
NFPA
NFPA 85
NFPA 86
OSHA
OSHA inpsector
pfd
prior use
process safety
process safety trends
PROFIBUS
PROFISAFE
Proof test
Prosafe PLC
proven in use
refinery explosion
reliability
Rockwell
Safety
safety fieldbus
Safety Instrumented System
safety integrity
safety lifecycle
Safety System
safety system modeling
Safety technical session
Safetyfield bus
saint patricks day
Sean Cunningham
Separation and independence
Seperation and indepenence
SFF
SIL
SIL New York City
SIL1
SIL2
SIL3
SIS
SIS hardware
SP 84
system security
Texas A&M
TMR
TUV
TX
Walt Boyes
Yokagawa
Navigation
Home
Blogs
My Reader
Archives
September 2009 (1)
June 2009 (1)
May 2009 (1)
February 2009 (2)
October 2008 (1)
September 2008 (1)
August 2008 (1)
June 2008 (3)
May 2008 (1)
March 2008 (1)
February 2008 (2)
January 2008 (1)
December 2007 (1)
November 2007 (1)
October 2007 (2)
September 2007 (2)
August 2007 (1)
July 2007 (1)
June 2007 (3)
May 2007 (4)
April 2007 (2)
March 2007 (3)
February 2007 (3)
January 2007 (1)
Browse by Tags
All Tags
»
process safety
(RSS)
1oo2D
2oo3
4-20ma
ANSI/ISA-84.00.01
bill goble
BMS
BPCS
Control magazine
exiderdome
IEC 61508
IEC 61511
ISA
ISA S84
OSHA
pfd
process safety trends
PROFIBUS
PROFISAFE
reliability
safety fieldbus
Safety Instrumented System
safety integrity
safety lifecycle
Safety System
Separation and independence
Seperation and indepenence
SIL New York City
SIS
SIS hardware
system security
TMR
Walt Boyes
Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:58 PM
Why Seperate when you can integrate
I'm taking a stance, and publicly telling you my vision on the issue of separation and integration for safety and control. When this happens, is still up to debate. I believe that one day it will only take one control system to automate your critical
Posted by
Charles Fialkowski
|
0 Comments
Filed under:
process safety
,
Safety Instrumented System
,
Safety System
,
SIS hardware
,
process safety trends
,
Seperation and indepenence
,
BPCS
,
Separation and independence
,
IEC 61508
,
ANSI/ISA-84.00.01
,
IEC 61511
,
safety integrity
Friday, October 31, 2008 2:58 PM
Let’s talk about SIX
Next week (Wednesday, November 5th) I have the honor of delivering a 45 minute presentation at the exiderdome in New York City. If you haven’t heard, or don’t know what exiderdome is, then check it out at www.sea.siemens.com/exiderdome the
Posted by
Charles Fialkowski
|
0 Comments
Filed under:
process safety
,
SIL New York City
,
safety lifecycle
,
exiderdome
Friday, December 21, 2007 3:53 PM
Wait for the BUS or go Old School
Here it is Friday, December 21, 2007 about 2:30pm, while most process safety specialists and marketing managers are enjoying the tidings; I just had to get something off my chest before I begin my holiday break. I was hoping to make my 2008 Process Safety
Posted by
Charles Fialkowski
|
0 Comments
Filed under:
process safety
,
ISA
,
4-20ma
,
PROFIBUS
,
PROFISAFE
Friday, October 26, 2007 3:14 PM
What the SIL are you talking about?
Have you had a chance to catch Bill Goble’s Hydrocarbon Processing (October 2007 issue) editorial titled “Still not using a safety PLC?” Essentially Bill addresses the question of whether you can use conventional equipment (PLC or DCS)
Posted by
Charles Fialkowski
|
0 Comments
Filed under:
process safety
,
SIS
,
Safety Instrumented System
,
SIS hardware
,
bill goble
,
IEC 61508
Friday, October 05, 2007 4:01 PM
Running to Destruction
Was not the response I was expecting to hear from an audience member during my presentation on new SIS (safety instrumented system) hardware development at this week’s ISA Expo. He obviously was concerned over my suggestion that with new SIS technology
Posted by
Charles Fialkowski
|
0 Comments
Filed under:
process safety
,
SIS
,
Safety Instrumented System
,
1oo2D
,
2oo3
,
SIS hardware
,
ISA S84
,
Separation and independence
,
TMR
Friday, May 18, 2007 9:43 AM
Hanging with the Boyes
This week our office had a visit from one of the most well respected automation journalists (and fellow BLOGGER), Mr. Walt Boyes, Editor and Chief of CONTROL magazine. It turned out to be a great visit as Walt shared with us his vision of the market and
Posted by
Charles Fialkowski
|
2 Comments
Filed under:
process safety
,
Safety Instrumented System
,
Seperation and indepenence
,
Control magazine
,
Walt Boyes
Friday, May 04, 2007 2:51 PM
Integrating the experts?
The cover story of the April edition of Automation World was titled “how much integration is right”. Of course they were covering the highly controversial topic of integrating your control and safety system. Many globally recognized experts
Posted by
Charles Fialkowski
|
0 Comments
Filed under:
process safety
,
SIS
,
Safety System
,
ISA S84
,
Seperation and indepenence
Thursday, February 15, 2007 1:34 PM
PFU - Probability of Failing to Understand
Recently I got caught up in a reliability discussion between a user and a vendor. The user worked for a large O&G company, and the vendor worked for a large company who manufactured process instrumentation. In this particular exchange, the user was
Posted by
Charles Fialkowski
|
0 Comments
Filed under:
process safety
,
SIS
,
Safety Instrumented System
,
Safety System
,
pfd
,
reliability
Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:22 AM
Process Safety in the year 2007
Working in and around process safety applications for most of my professional career (just under 20 years), I've enjoyed watching, discussing and participating on many technical challenges and advances regarding safety instrumented systems (SIS).
Posted by
Charles Fialkowski
|
1 Comments
Filed under:
process safety
,
SIS
,
Safety Instrumented System
,
Safety System
,
BMS
,
system security
,
safety fieldbus
,
1oo2D
,
2oo3
Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:50 AM
OSHA 1910.119 and ISA S84
I got an interesting question this week from one of our sales people. He told me that a competitor, new to the process safety market, supplied his customer with a list of their users who are compliant with 29CFR1910.119. He wondered if we had a similar
Posted by
Charles Fialkowski
|
0 Comments
Filed under:
process safety
,
SIS
,
Safety Instrumented System
,
OSHA
,
Safety System